Skip to content

Outage tracker / LaunchDarkly

Is LaunchDarkly down?

I'm having a problem

Vendor reports no incidentWhat LaunchDarkly reports

LaunchDarkly reports no incident on its status page.

As of the last successful poll, 2026-10-22 21:50 UTC.

LaunchDarkly's status page

Our regional reading

This is our own reading from outside, shown beside the vendor's statement. It is not counted as a separate outage.

Checks passingchecked 2 minutes ago

Our checks of LaunchDarkly pass from all 10 regions we check.

As of Oct 22, 2026, 9:50 PM UTC, RealUptime's checks of LaunchDarkly passed in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Front-door and live API checks

our check readinglive · checked Oct 22, 2026, 9:50 PM UTC
US-East811 msChecks passing
US-West1023 msChecks passing
Europe657 msChecks passing
Asia-Pacific1435 msChecks passing
US-Central387 msChecks passing
Canada734 msChecks passing
UK902 msChecks passing
Southeast Asia1923 msChecks passing
Australia2120 msChecks passing
South America1228 msChecks passing
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

LaunchDarkly reports: All systems operational (“All Systems Operational”)

from LaunchDarkly's own status page, checked Oct 22, 2026, 9:33 PM UTC
LaunchDarkly's own status page shows no incident, and our checks of LaunchDarkly pass right now.

LaunchDarkly's own component breakdown, as they publish it

  • Audit logOperational
  • AuthenticationOperational
  • Config managementOperational
  • Context processingOperational
  • Emails and notificationsOperational
  • Experiment managementOperational
  • Feature workflowsOperational
  • FrontendOperational
  • Past experiment iterationsOperational
  • Rollout managementOperational
  • Server-side streaming APIOperational
  • Client-side streaming APIOperational
  • Data ExportOperational
  • Flag targetingOperational
  • GraphsOperational
  • Integrations and webhooksOperational
  • MetricsOperational
  • Query APIOperational
  • Rollout results processingOperational
  • Docs (launchdarkly.com/docs)Operational
  • Experiment results processingOperational
  • Expiring Contexts TargetsOperational
  • Flag usage metricsOperational
  • Observability Data Ingest (Sessions, Errors)Operational
  • Playgrounds and offline evaluationsOperational
  • Polling APIOperational
  • Rollout results analysisOperational
  • Segment managementOperational
  • Web app (app.launchdarkly.com)Operational
  • AI insightsOperational
  • Edge APIOperational
  • Experiment results analysisOperational
  • OpenTelemetry (Logs, Traces, Metrics)Operational
  • Progressive rolloutsOperational
  • Website (launchdarkly.com)Operational
  • Release pipelinesOperational
  • Warehouse native experimentationOperational
  • Account managementOperational
  • SDKsOperational

These are LaunchDarkly's components, named and scored by LaunchDarkly. We do not map them onto the functions we check above, because we have no way to know which of their components our checks touch. Two lists, side by side, neither one rewriting the other.

This is LaunchDarkly's own claim about their service, shown separately from what we measured. We never change our own numbers based on what a vendor reports, and this reading never changes theirs. Read both.

LaunchDarkly response time, by region

US-East
988msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 527ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 508ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 421ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 379ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 429ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 418ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 428ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 411ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 400ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 346ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 403ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 471ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 431ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 458ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 381ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 537ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 375ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 324ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 238ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 199ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 548ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 560ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 579ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 621ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 794ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 993ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 973ms2026-10-22 UTC: p95 988ms
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
US-West
1.2sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 530ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 652ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 603ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 656ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 557ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 543ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 548ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 550ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 506ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 470ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 769ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 732ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 673ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 632ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 700ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 706ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 668ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 492ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 521ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 611ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 672ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 683ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 660ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 676ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.2s
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
Europe
847msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 678ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 771ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 800ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 718ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 664ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 769ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 790ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 636ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 701ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 681ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 669ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 718ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 538ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 551ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 582ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 609ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 634ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 596ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 598ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 590ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 563ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 815ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 818ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 934ms2026-10-20 UTC: p95 779ms2026-10-21 UTC: p95 905ms2026-10-22 UTC: p95 847ms
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
Asia-Pacific
1.9sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.9s
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
US-Central
725msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 359ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 420ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 400ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 453ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 403ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 321ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 189ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 185ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 343ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 366ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 667ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 613ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 712ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 651ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 661ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 806ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 900ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 861ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 907ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 872ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 845ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 981ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 738ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 725ms
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
Canada
1.2sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 600ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 680ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 706ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 731ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 762ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 663ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 666ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 633ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 654ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 716ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 676ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 689ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 652ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 662ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 675ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 627ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 763ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 774ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 792ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 744ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 705ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 689ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 770ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 730ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 887ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.2s
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
UK
947msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 664ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 699ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 711ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 743ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 795ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 833ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 750ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 750ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 832ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 578ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 517ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 641ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 683ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 698ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 696ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 709ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 725ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 692ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 720ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 719ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 577ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 572ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 571ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 572ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 532ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 705ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 713ms2026-10-20 UTC: p95 890ms2026-10-21 UTC: p95 846ms2026-10-22 UTC: p95 947ms
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
Southeast Asia
2.6sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 2.6s
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
Australia
2.7sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.9s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.9s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 2.7s
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22
South America
1.5sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-23 UTC: p95 935ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 974ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.5s
Sep 23Oct 7Oct 22

Check your own site while you wait on LaunchDarkly

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not LaunchDarkly. It cannot diagnose LaunchDarkly's own systems.

What we measured, function by function

LaunchDarkly answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the api row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • APIprimaryUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing

Email me when LaunchDarkly reports an incident on its status page, and again when it reports it resolved.

Get an email when LaunchDarkly reports an incident

Email me when LaunchDarkly reports an incident on its status page, and again when it reports it resolved. No account, no card.

Delivery channel

Double opt-in: nothing is sent until you click the link in the confirmation email. One email when it reports an incident, one when it reports it resolved, and a one-click unsubscribe in every one. We do not send anything else to this address.

This is LaunchDarkly's own statement from its status page, with our regional reading beside it.

What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What our checks show, and what people reported

  • North America
    Checks passingUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Checks passinglatency: 811msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:44 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Checks passinglatency: 1023msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:47 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Checks passinglatency: 387msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:48 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Checks passinglatency: 734msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:38 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Checks passinglatency: 1228msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:34 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    Checks passingEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Checks passinglatency: 657msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:50 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Checks passinglatency: 902msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:44 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    Checks passingAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Checks passinglatency: 1435msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:44 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Checks passinglatency: 1923msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:41 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Checks passinglatency: 2120msstatus code: 401checked: Oct 22, 2026, 9:43 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach LaunchDarkly normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using LaunchDarkly, counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for LaunchDarkly yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent probe events

Elevated 5xx Errors (15:11–15:32 UTC), 1mdeclared on their status page2026-10-15
Delays in Guarded Rollouts, Progressive Rollouts, Release Pipelines, and Experimentation, 1h 37mdeclared on their status page2026-10-03
Elevated error rates in the LaunchDarkly application, 18h 55mdeclared on their status page2026-10-02
Flag delivery errors in Streaming API, 1mdeclared on their status page2026-08-26
Email delivery failure affecting sign-up verification and notification emails, 1h 15mdeclared on their status page2026-08-24
Flag Updates via Polling API delayed, 5h 26mdeclared on their status page2026-08-17
Flag Updates delayed in US Region, 2hdeclared on their status page2026-08-14
Elevated errors on server-side SDK streaming connections, 46mdeclared on their status page2026-08-07

check entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring LaunchDarkly since August 22, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for LaunchDarkly covering any window you pick, with our check readings and LaunchDarkly's own claim at the time, side by side.

Full check history for LaunchDarkly: 90 days of check results by region, month-by-month uptime by our checks, and every probe event on record.

Monitor your own site the same way

This page shows what we see when we check this service, using the same ten regions, for a site you run. RealUptime Monitor watches your own servers from inside your network, and it starts free.

Start monitoring your own servers

Put this badge in your README

LaunchDarkly uptime by RealUptime's checksLive, from this page's own readings.
[![LaunchDarkly uptime by RealUptime's checks](https://realuptime.io/outages/launchdarkly/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/launchdarkly)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/launchdarkly"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/launchdarkly/badge.svg?days=30" alt="LaunchDarkly uptime by RealUptime's checks" height="20"></a>

The badge shows the share of our checks that passed over the last 30 days. The window is printed on it, so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so and shows no color. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

To cite this page: RealUptime, "Is LaunchDarkly down?", https://realuptime.io/outages/launchdarkly. The readings change with every check, so give the date you read them.

Checking a site of your own? The free website down checker sends it one request and reports the answer, and the SLA calculator shows how much downtime an uptime figure allows.

What we check

primaryfunctional: live API
https://app.launchdarkly.com/api/v2/projects
secondary
https://launchdarkly.com/
secondary
https://status.launchdarkly.com/api/v2/status.json

What our check can and cannot see

A pass means the service's servers answered with the sign-in refusal they give any request that is not signed in. It does not show that sign-in works or that anything behind the sign-in wall responds.

Host checked: app.launchdarkly.com

RealUptime is not affiliated with LaunchDarkly; the name identifies what we checked, and nothing here speaks for LaunchDarkly's own team. We send a single web request to LaunchDarkly from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside LaunchDarkly's systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal LaunchDarkly's own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for LaunchDarkly is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a passing check there says an API answered, though it still does not show that every feature of the service works for you. Read the full methodology.