Skip to content

Outage tracker / Battle.net (Blizzard)

Is Battle.net (Blizzard) down?

I'm having a problem

Partially degradedchecked moments ago

Battle.net (Blizzard) is answering our probes, but its web surface is running at least 4.4x its 7-day median from UK and its sign-in surface is running at least 6.3x its 7-day median from UK. Everything else we check answered at its usual speed.

As of Oct 19, 2026, 9:26 PM UTC, RealUptime's checks of Battle.net (Blizzard) passed in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Front-door and live API checks

Our checks of Battle.net (Blizzard) did not fail from two or more distant regions in the 60 days we have checked it (since Aug 20, 2026). This does not show Battle.net (Blizzard) works for users.

Email me when our checks of Battle.net (Blizzard) fail from two or more distant regions

One email when our checks of Battle.net (Blizzard) fail from two or more distant regions, and one when they pass, after you confirm the address. No account, no card.

This is our own reading from outside. It is not Battle.net (Blizzard)'s official status.

our check readinglive · checked Oct 19, 2026, 9:26 PM UTC
US-East1918 msChecks passing
US-West1578 msChecks passing
Europe670 msChecks passing
Asia-Pacific1300 msChecks passing
US-Central1326 msChecks passing
Canada765 msChecks passing
UK1064 msDegraded
Southeast Asia1629 msChecks passing
Australia613 msChecks passing
South America2803 msChecks passing
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

Battle.net (Blizzard) publishes no status feed we can read, so the only reading here is our check reading on the left.

Battle.net (Blizzard) response time, by region

US-East
2.1sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.1s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
US-West
1.8sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 835ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 813ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 875ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 800ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 579ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 669ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 606ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 597ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 588ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 572ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 767ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 990ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 961ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.8s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Europe
1.6sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 191ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 232ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 296ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 255ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 380ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 418ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 351ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 309ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 392ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 521ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 804ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 940ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 946ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 928ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 732ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.6s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Asia-Pacific
2.5sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 970ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.5s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
US-Central
1.2sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 577ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 580ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 575ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 798ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 694ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 528ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 505ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 493ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 514ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 484ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 911ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 760ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 670ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 624ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 697ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 618ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 663ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 681ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 536ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 690ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 653ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 712ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 708ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 630ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 594ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 618ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 634ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.2s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Canada
728msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 619ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 734ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 733ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 768ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 964ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 773ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 728ms
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
UK
1.7sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 428ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 423ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 460ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 584ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 623ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 589ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 489ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 551ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 596ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 486ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 715ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 205ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 208ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 266ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 173ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 220ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 277ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 822ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.7s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Southeast Asia
2.2sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 2s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.2s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Australia
1.7sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.7s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
South America
3.5sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 3.3s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 3.4s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 3.5s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19

Check your own site while you wait on Battle.net (Blizzard)

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not Battle.net (Blizzard). It cannot diagnose Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own systems.

What we measured, function by function

Battle.net (Blizzard) answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the auth row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Degraded Answering, but 4.4x slower than its 7-day median.Southeast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • AuthprimaryUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Degraded Answering, but 6.3x slower than its 7-day median.Southeast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What our checks show, and what people reported

  • North America
    Checks passingUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Checks passinglatency: 1918msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:22 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Checks passinglatency: 1578msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:22 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Checks passinglatency: 1326msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:17 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Checks passinglatency: 765msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:21 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Checks passinglatency: 2803msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:11 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    DegradedEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Checks passinglatency: 670msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:17 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Degradedlatency: 1064msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:17 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    Checks passingAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Checks passinglatency: 1300msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:20 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Checks passinglatency: 1629msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:09 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Checks passinglatency: 613msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 9:26 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using Battle.net (Blizzard), counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for Battle.net (Blizzard) yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent probe events

No probe events on record yet for Battle.net (Blizzard).

check entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring Battle.net (Blizzard) since August 20, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for Battle.net (Blizzard) covering any window you pick, with our check readings and Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own claim at the time, side by side.

Full check history for Battle.net (Blizzard): 90 days of check results by region, month-by-month uptime by our checks, and every probe event on record.

Put this badge in your README

Battle.net (Blizzard) uptime by RealUptime's checksLive, from this page's own readings.
[![Battle.net (Blizzard) uptime by RealUptime's checks](https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net/badge.svg?days=30" alt="Battle.net (Blizzard) uptime by RealUptime's checks" height="20"></a>

The badge shows the share of our checks that passed over the last 30 days. The window is printed on it, so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so and shows no color. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

To cite this page: RealUptime, "Is Battle.net (Blizzard) down?", https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net. The readings change with every check, so give the date you read them.

Checking a site of your own? The free website down checker sends it one request and reports the answer, and the SLA calculator shows how much downtime an uptime figure allows.

How our checks compare with Battle.net (Blizzard)'s stated SLA

At or above your target

Our checks of Battle.net (Blizzard) failed for none over the last 30 days, which is 100% uptime by our checks. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

Our checks show no gap in this period. That does not rule out one you saw.

These figures come from our own checks of one public endpoint per service. They are not the service's real uptime. This is computed from our own checks, not from Battle.net (Blizzard)'s SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

primaryfunctional: auth surface
https://oauth.battle.net/.well-known/openid-configuration
secondary
https://www.blizzard.com/

What our check can and cannot see

A pass means the configuration document the service publishes, such as an API or sign-in description, loaded. That document is usually static or cached, so it does not show that the endpoints it describes are answering.

Host checked: oauth.battle.net

RealUptime is not affiliated with Battle.net (Blizzard); the name identifies what we checked, and nothing here speaks for Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own team. We send a single web request to Battle.net (Blizzard) from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside Battle.net (Blizzard)'s systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for Battle.net (Blizzard) is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a passing check there says an API answered, though it still does not show that every feature of the service works for you. Read the full methodology.