Compare · RealUptime Status
RealUptime Status vs Status.io
Status.io has run hosted status pages for over a decade and its feature list shows it: SMS and social broadcast on higher tiers, SSO for private pages, custom certificates. It does not run uptime checks of its own; its charts are powered by a custom metric API or external monitoring sources, per its own site. RealUptime Status is built the other way around: the page is a front end on measurements the product itself takes.
Built-in endpoint monitoring
Have
every component's state comes from RealUptime's own probes
Don’t have
charts are powered via its Custom Metric API or external sources such as New Relic or Pingdom, per its own homepage
Free tier
Have
1 page, 10 monitors, 100 subscribers, $0/mo
Don’t have
no free plan on its published pricing; plans start at $79/mo (Basic)
Entry paid plan
Have
$28.99/mo Growth
Have
$79/mo Basic: 500 subscribers, 5 team members, 5 metrics
Subscriber notifications
Have
email and webhook on every tier; 100 subscribers free, up to 10,000 on Scale
Have
email and webhook on all tiers; SMS (via Twilio or Vonage) and Twitter/X broadcast on higher tiers
Phone-call and SMS notifications
Don’t have
subscriber and alert channels are email, Slack, webhook, and the integration registry; no telephony
Have
SMS notifications through your Twilio or Vonage account, on higher tiers
Custom domain with automatic TLS
Have
Growth and Scale
Have
custom domain and TLS subdomain on all tiers
Automatic incident updates on monitor transitions
Have
a failing monitor offers a one-click, prefilled incident
Partial
via its API or connected external monitoring, not from checks of its own
Deciding between Status.io and Statuspage instead?
Looking for a Status.io alternative?
For the reasoning behind checking from more than one region at all, see why a status page can show all green during a real outage. Comparing more than just this one alternative? The status page tool checklist covers what to test before committing to any of them.