Skip to content

Outage tracker / X (Twitter)

Is X (Twitter) down?

I'm having a problem

Partially degradedchecked moments ago

X (Twitter) is answering our probes, but its web surface is running at least 6x its 7-day median from US-West and its sign-in surface is running at least 0.5x its 7-day median from US-West. Everything else we check answered at its usual speed.

As of Oct 19, 2026, 8:55 PM UTC, RealUptime's checks of X (Twitter) passed in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Front-door and live API checks

Last time our checks failed from two or more distant regions: 11 min on Sep 13, 2026 (web surface, from Europe, South America, US-East, US-Central, US-West and Canada).

Email me when our checks of X (Twitter) fail from two or more distant regions

One email when our checks of X (Twitter) fail from two or more distant regions, and one when they pass, after you confirm the address. No account, no card.

This is our own reading from outside. It is not X (Twitter)'s official status.

our check readinglive · checked Oct 19, 2026, 8:55 PM UTC
US-East539 msChecks passing
US-West2196 msDegraded
Europe2028 msChecks passing
Asia-Pacific1086 msChecks passing
US-Central308 msChecks passing
Canada1401 msChecks passing
UK367 msChecks passing
Southeast Asia915 msChecks passing
Australia1419 msChecks passing
South America1215 msChecks passing
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

X (Twitter) publishes no status feed we can read, so the only reading here is our check reading on the left.

X (Twitter) response time, by region

US-East
2.3sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 335ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 358ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 382ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 406ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 439ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 402ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 418ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 456ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 405ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 438ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 473ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.3s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
US-West
2.0sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 386ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 407ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 518ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 796ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 415ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 773ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 529ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 879ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 478ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 467ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 418ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 518ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 525ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 502ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 478ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 556ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 498ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 514ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 486ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 629ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 639ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 476ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 514ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 515ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 480ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 750ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.0s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Europe
1.9sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 456ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 469ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 463ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 402ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 449ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 395ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 387ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 416ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 370ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 349ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 411ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.9s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Asia-Pacific
1.4sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 921ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 995ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 982ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 907ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 834ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 816ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 820ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 790ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 881ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 790ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 793ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 820ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 775ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 786ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 824ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 787ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 780ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 895ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 813ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.4s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
US-Central
2.0sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 532ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 460ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 497ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 813ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 763ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 787ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 820ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 581ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 528ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 576ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 657ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.0s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Canada
2.8sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 667ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 631ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 894ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 604ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 693ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 717ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 604ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 627ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 578ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 586ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 673ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.8s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
UK
1.9sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 768ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 713ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 588ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 631ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 570ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 619ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 576ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 637ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 653ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 596ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 605ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.9s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Southeast Asia
1.7sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 964ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 937ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 990ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 916ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 975ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.7s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
Australia
2.3sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 969ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.3s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19
South America
3.4sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 818ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 704ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 720ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 773ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 904ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 870ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 811ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 970ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 3.4s
Sep 20Oct 4Oct 19

Check your own site while you wait on X (Twitter)

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not X (Twitter). It cannot diagnose X (Twitter)'s own systems.

What we measured, function by function

X (Twitter) answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the web row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebprimaryUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Degraded Answering, but 6x slower than its 7-day median.Europe: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • AuthUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Degraded Answering, but 0.5x slower than its 7-day median.Europe: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What our checks show, and what people reported

  • North America
    DegradedUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Checks passinglatency: 539msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:55 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Degradedlatency: 2196msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:55 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Checks passinglatency: 308msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:53 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Checks passinglatency: 1401msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:55 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Checks passinglatency: 1215msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:53 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    Checks passingEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Checks passinglatency: 2028msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:55 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Checks passinglatency: 367msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:53 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    Checks passingAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Checks passinglatency: 1086msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:54 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Checks passinglatency: 915msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:53 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Checks passinglatency: 1419msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 19, 2026, 8:54 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using X (Twitter), counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for X (Twitter) yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent probe events

Checks failing, 11mour checks · Europe and South America and US-East and US-Central and US-West and Canada2026-09-13

check entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring X (Twitter) since August 20, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for X (Twitter) covering any window you pick, with our check readings and X (Twitter)'s own claim at the time, side by side.

Full check history for X (Twitter): 90 days of check results by region, month-by-month uptime by our checks, and every probe event on record.

Put this badge in your README

X (Twitter) uptime by RealUptime's checksLive, from this page's own readings.
[![X (Twitter) uptime by RealUptime's checks](https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter/badge.svg?days=30" alt="X (Twitter) uptime by RealUptime's checks" height="20"></a>

The badge shows the share of our checks that passed over the last 30 days. The window is printed on it, so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so and shows no color. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

To cite this page: RealUptime, "Is X (Twitter) down?", https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter. The readings change with every check, so give the date you read them.

Checking a site of your own? The free website down checker sends it one request and reports the answer, and the SLA calculator shows how much downtime an uptime figure allows.

How our checks compare with X (Twitter)'s stated SLA

At or above your target

Our checks of X (Twitter) failed for none over the last 30 days, which is 100% uptime by our checks. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

Our checks show no gap in this period. That does not rule out one you saw.

These figures come from our own checks of one public endpoint per service. They are not the service's real uptime. This is computed from our own checks, not from X (Twitter)'s SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

secondaryfunctional: auth surface
https://api.x.com/2/tweets/20
primary
https://x.com/

What our check can and cannot see

A pass means the service's public web page loaded and answered normally. It does not show that the product, the API or sign-in behind it works; a page can load from a cache while the product is down.

Host checked: x.com

RealUptime is not affiliated with X (Twitter); the name identifies what we checked, and nothing here speaks for X (Twitter)'s own team. We send a single web request to X (Twitter) from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside X (Twitter)'s systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal X (Twitter)'s own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for X (Twitter) is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a passing check there says an API answered, though it still does not show that every feature of the service works for you. Read the full methodology.