Skip to content

Outage tracker

Travis CI: incident history

The last 24 hours in detail, Travis CI's declared incident record, and our regional check results beside it.

← Back to Travis CI's check readings

We started checking Travis CI on November 2, 2026, which is 6 days ago. Everything below covers that period, not the full 90 days a longer-tracked service would show.

Email me when Travis CI reports an incident on its status page, and again when it reports it resolved.

One email when it is reported and one when it is resolved, after you confirm the address. No account, no card.

This is Travis CI's own statement from its status page, with our regional reading beside it.

The last 24 hours

What happened most recently, on one time axis: our own probe readings by surface, how many people reported a problem, and what Travis CI's own status page declared. Below it, any public chatter we saw about Travis CI and the extra probe it triggered.

The last 24 hours on one axis: what our probes read for each surface we check, how many people reported a problem, and what Travis CI's own status page declared. Three records side by side; none of them changes another.

Our probes, web
Our probes, api (primary)
Unverified user reportsNo reports about Travis CI in the last 24 hours, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.
Travis CI's status pageNo incident declared in the last 24 hours.

Each check cell is the worst reading across every region in that quarter hour: one region that did not answer colours the cell, never an average. An amber cell is a reading that answered, but at three times or more its 7-day median for three checks running: slow is not down, and we say which. A filtered reading stays neutral, because a refused check is not a failed check. Report bars count reports as submitted; we do not check who sent them, and they never change our reading. The status-page lane is Travis CI's own declaration, shown as they made it.

Third-party chatter, labeled

Public posts from the last hour that mention Travis CI next to an outage word (“down”, “outage”, “not working”). This is what other people said in public, collected by keyword: not something we measured, and not the user reports above. It never affects the verdict.

No matching public posts in the last hour from the sources we watch.

Checks passing by region

Checks passing is the checks that passed, divided by every check we attempted, per region. Not interpolated, not smoothed, and never computed for a region with zero recorded samples.

RegionChecks passingProbes recorded
US-East96.28%592
US-West95.37%454
Europe96.36%412
Asia-Pacific92.77%249

Their declared record

Travis CI's own incident history, taken from their public status feed. This is their account of what happened, not our check reading.

Build job(s) failuresMinor incident
May 25, 2026, 2:12 PM UTC to May 25, 2026, 7:26 PM UTC (5h 14m)resolved
their latest update (May 25, 2026, 7:26 PM UTC): The fix has been successful, and all systems are now operating normally. We will continue to monitor performance closely. Thank you for your patience and understanding as we addressed this issue. If you continue to experience any residual issues or have further questions, please…
Trials not workingAll systems operational
Dec 20, 2024, 6:44 PM UTC to Jan 28, 2025, 6:45 PM UTC (39d 0h)resolved
their latest update (Jan 28, 2025, 6:45 PM UTC): This incident has been resolved.
arm64 jobs not runningAll systems operational
Sep 4, 2024, 2:54 PM UTC to Sep 4, 2024, 7:23 PM UTC (4h 29m)resolved
their latest update (Sep 4, 2024, 7:23 PM UTC): This incident has been resolved.
DPLv2 dependency update causes DPLv2 deployments to failAll systems operational
Aug 29, 2024, 2:07 PM UTC to Sep 23, 2024, 8:42 AM UTC (24d 18h)resolved
their latest update (Sep 23, 2024, 8:42 AM UTC): Build images updates and DPLv2 updates will drop continuously. DPLv2 will be promoted as default DPL gem version at Sep-30th.
Builds not being processedMinor incident
Aug 28, 2024, 10:31 PM UTC to Aug 29, 2024, 2:00 AM UTC (3h 28m)resolved
their latest update (Aug 29, 2024, 2:00 AM UTC): This issue has been resolved and now builds are running as expected.
s390x and ppc64le jobs not runningAll systems operational
Aug 23, 2024, 1:58 PM UTC to Aug 29, 2024, 2:23 PM UTC (6d 0h)resolved
their latest update (Aug 29, 2024, 2:23 PM UTC): This incident has been resolved for Bionic and Focal builds. We're working on Jammy builds that should be fixed soon, updates will be posted to our changelog page.
macOS builds failingPartial outage
Jan 17, 2024, 8:07 AM UTC to Jan 17, 2024, 11:15 AM UTC (3h 8m)resolved
their latest update (Jan 17, 2024, 11:15 AM UTC): This incident has been resolved.
Build jobs from branches/tags on GitHub ran on main/master branch in Travis CIMinor incident
Nov 16, 2023, 10:30 AM UTC to Nov 16, 2023, 4:56 PM UTC (6h 27m)resolved
their latest update (Nov 16, 2023, 4:56 PM UTC): Incident resolved.
GitHub sync blocked or lasting long - degraded performanceMinor incident
Nov 3, 2023, 12:29 PM UTC to Nov 3, 2023, 3:46 PM UTC (3h 17m)resolved
their latest update (Nov 3, 2023, 3:46 PM UTC): Data synchronization issues with GitHub have been fully resolved and all systems are operational
Travis API errors.Minor incident
Oct 28, 2023, 12:15 PM UTC to Oct 28, 2023, 1:32 PM UTC (1h 18m)resolved
their latest update (Oct 28, 2023, 1:32 PM UTC): Operation back to normal.

Showing the 10 most recent of 50 incidents Travis CI has declared in the history we hold.

These entries are Travis CI's own declarations, taken from their public status feed, shown separately from our own check readings. Their page publishes what they choose to publish: an incident missing here means they did not declare one, not that nothing happened, and an incident here is their account, not our measurement. Neither record ever changes the other.

Travis CI's own status feed works, so its declared incidents are the record and our probe events are not listed or counted. Our check results by region are above, as a reading beside the statement.

Full detail on what a probe does and does not prove is in the methodology page.