Skip to content

Outage tracker / Telegram

Is Telegram down?

I'm having a problem

Checks passingchecked moments ago

Our checks of Telegram pass from all 10 regions we check.

As of Oct 11, 2026, 9:31 PM UTC, RealUptime's checks of Telegram passed in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Front-door and live API checks

Our checks of Telegram did not fail from two or more distant regions in the 64 days we have checked it (since Aug 8, 2026). This does not show Telegram works for users.

Email me when our checks of Telegram fail from two or more distant regions

One email when our checks of Telegram fail from two or more distant regions, and one when they pass, after you confirm the address. No account, no card.

This is our own reading from outside. It is not Telegram's official status.

our check readinglive · checked Oct 11, 2026, 9:31 PM UTC
US-East748 msChecks passing
US-West832 msChecks passing
Europe245 msChecks passing
Asia-Pacific1413 msChecks passing
US-Central535 msChecks passing
Canada554 msChecks passing
UK107 msChecks passing
Southeast Asia1270 msChecks passing
Australia1758 msChecks passing
South America1372 msChecks passing
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

Telegram publishes no status feed we can read, so the only reading here is our check reading on the left.

Telegram response time, by region

US-East
611msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 593ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 838ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 614ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 724ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 744ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 791ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 756ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 776ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 726ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 698ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 890ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 816ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 793ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 645ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 719ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 635ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 787ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 779ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 606ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 791ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 607ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 598ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 604ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 675ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 683ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 594ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 668ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 698ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 651ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 611ms
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
US-West
859msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 718ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 698ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 637ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 875ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 927ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 904ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 927ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 973ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 875ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 788ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 771ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 923ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 839ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 838ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 815ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 833ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 830ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 950ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 915ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 859ms
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
Europe
395msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 307ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 277ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 333ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 415ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 603ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 679ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 637ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 716ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 593ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 756ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 731ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 661ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 922ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 708ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 552ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 451ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 575ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 585ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 292ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 241ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 368ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 453ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 348ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 348ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 376ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 383ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 297ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 240ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 229ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 395ms
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
Asia-Pacific
1.9sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.9s
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
US-Central
934msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 644ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 675ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 732ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 636ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 618ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 614ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 595ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 754ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 715ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 690ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 612ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 801ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 909ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 683ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 739ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 636ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 641ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 677ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 797ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 845ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 846ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 864ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 799ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 800ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 794ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 771ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 851ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 824ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 881ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 934ms
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
Canada
613msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 824ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 688ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 793ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 702ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 678ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 707ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 712ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 808ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 764ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 751ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 759ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 841ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 615ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 584ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 731ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 829ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 835ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 794ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 801ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 819ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 734ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 880ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 764ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 664ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 655ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 578ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 680ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 698ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 597ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 613ms
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
UK
173msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 76ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 170ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 175ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 203ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 217ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 238ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 202ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 299ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 243ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 291ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 355ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 329ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 369ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 377ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 534ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 259ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 252ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 295ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 383ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 462ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 425ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 414ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 226ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 295ms2026-10-06 UTC: p95 289ms2026-10-07 UTC: p95 276ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 292ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 362ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 315ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 173ms
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
Southeast Asia
1.3sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 987ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 967ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 975ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.3s
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
Australia
2.8sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 3.3s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.8s
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11
South America
1.8sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-06 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.8s
Sep 12Sep 26Oct 11

Check your own site while you wait on Telegram

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not Telegram -- it cannot diagnose Telegram's own systems.

What we measured, function by function

Telegram answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the web row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebprimaryUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • AuthUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What our checks show, and what people reported

  • North America
    Checks passingUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Checks passinglatency: 748msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:31 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Checks passinglatency: 832msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:29 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Checks passinglatency: 535msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:14 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Checks passinglatency: 554msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:27 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Checks passinglatency: 1372msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:21 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    Checks passingEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Checks passinglatency: 245msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:22 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Checks passinglatency: 107msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:28 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    Checks passingAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Checks passinglatency: 1413msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:22 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Checks passinglatency: 1270msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:27 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Checks passinglatency: 1758msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 11, 2026, 9:29 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using Telegram, counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We started counting reports for Telegram on September 8, 2026.

Recent probe events

No probe events on record yet for Telegram.

check entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring Telegram since August 8, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for Telegram covering any window you pick, with our check readings and Telegram's own claim at the time, side by side.

Full check history for Telegram: 90 days of check results by region, month-by-month uptime by our checks, and every probe event on record.

Put this badge in your README

Telegram uptime by RealUptime's checksLive, from this page's own readings.
[![Telegram uptime by RealUptime's checks](https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram/badge.svg?days=30" alt="Telegram uptime by RealUptime's checks"></a>

The badge shows the share of our checks that passed over the last 30 days, and the window is printed on it so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so and shows no color. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

How our checks compare with Telegram's stated SLA

At or above your target

Our checks of Telegram failed for none over the last 30 days, which is 100% uptime by our checks. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

Our checks show no gap in this period. That does not rule out one you saw.

These figures come from our own checks of one public endpoint per service. They are not the service's real uptime. This is computed from our own checks, not from Telegram's SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

primary
https://web.telegram.org/
secondaryfunctional: auth surface
https://api.telegram.org/bot0:0/getMe

What our check can and cannot see

A pass means the service's public web page loaded and answered normally. It does not show that the product, the API or sign-in behind it works; a page can load from a cache while the product is down.

Host checked: web.telegram.org

RealUptime is not affiliated with Telegram; the name identifies what we checked, and nothing here speaks for Telegram's own team. We send a single web request to Telegram from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside Telegram's systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal Telegram's own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for Telegram is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a passing check there says an API answered, though it still does not show that every feature of the service works for you. Read the full methodology.